Chapter 7: Measuring Domestic Output and National Income
Chapter 6 introduced real GDP as the first big summary statistic and promised to build it properly. This chapter does that.
National income accounting is the system of tools the government uses to measure the economy’s total output and income. In the United States, the Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes these numbers.
GDP is a surprisingly young idea. Before the 1930s, no one produced an official, comprehensive measure of the economy’s total output.
The pain was obvious. The size of the collapse was not. Leaders could not say how far output had fallen, whether recovery had started, or whether their policies were working.
You cannot manage what you cannot measure.

Gross domestic product (GDP) is the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in one year.
The same item can be either. Flour bought by a family to bake at home is a final good. Flour bought by a bakery to make bread is an intermediate good.
If GDP added up every sale at every stage, the same wheat would be counted again and again. This mistake is multiple counting.
The fix is to count only the value added at each stage: the sale price minus the cost of the intermediate goods bought from the previous stage.
Adding up value added gives exactly the price of the final good.
A loaf of bread passes through three stages:
GDP counts new production. Some large money flows are not production at all:
Recall the circular flow from Chapter 2.
Every dollar spent on output becomes someone’s income. So:
\[ \text{GDP (output)} = \text{Total spending} = \text{Total income} \]
That is why there are two ways to measure GDP.
The expenditures approach adds up spending on final goods by four groups:
\[ GDP = C + I_g + G + X_n \]
Household spending on final goods and services, the largest component of GDP in the United States. Three types:
Tuition counts as consumption, not investment, even though it builds human capital (Chapter 6).
Investment in GDP means spending on new capital and changes in inventories. It has three parts:
Buying existing stocks or bonds is not investment. Neither is buying an existing house.
Machines wear out. Depreciation (consumption of fixed capital) is the value of capital used up during the year.
\[ \text{Net investment} = \text{Gross investment} - \text{Depreciation} \]
Only gross investment (Ig) goes into GDP.
Spending by federal, state, and local governments on final goods and services: roads, teachers’ salaries, military equipment.
Transfer payments are not included, because nothing is produced in exchange.
\[ X_n = \text{Exports} - \text{Imports} \]
An economy reports the following (billions of dollars):
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Durable goods purchased by households | 900 |
| Nondurable goods purchased by households | 2,300 |
| Services purchased by households | 5,400 |
| Business spending on machinery and buildings | 1,500 |
| New residential construction | 700 |
| Increase in business inventories | 100 |
| Government purchases of goods and services | 2,900 |
| Social Security and other transfer payments | 1,600 |
| Exports | 1,400 |
| Imports | 1,700 |
| Depreciation | 1,100 |
| Purchases of existing stocks and bonds | 800 |
For each event, say whether it counts in this year’s GDP. If it does, name the component.
Answer: consumption (PCEC) is by far the largest, while investment (GPDI) is much more volatile.
Answer: it is mostly negative, so the country has been importing more than it exports.
Answer: imports are subtracted only because they are already counted in C, Ig, and G, so they are removed to count only domestic production.
Since output equals income, GDP can also be measured by adding up the incomes earned producing it. The income approach uses these categories:
These six add up to national income (NI). One more item, depreciation, completes the bridge to GDP, because output that merely replaces worn-out capital is still output.
Add up spending on final goods and services:
\[ GDP = C + I_g + G + X_n \]
Add up the incomes earned producing them:
\[ \begin{aligned} NI &= \text{Compensation} + \text{Rents} + \text{Interest} \\ &\quad + \text{Proprietors' income} + \text{Corporate profits} \\ &\quad + \text{Taxes on production and imports} \end{aligned} \]
\[ GDP = NI + \text{Depreciation} \]
Same output, counted from two sides. Spending on the economy’s output is exactly the income the economy generates. (Two small adjustments, the statistical discrepancy and net foreign factor income, are ignored in this course’s examples.)
Here is the income side of the same economy whose spending we added up earlier (billions of dollars):
\(NI = 7{,}800 + 300 + 500 + 1{,}000\) \(1{,}900 + 900 = 12{,}400\)
\(GDP = 12{,}400 + 1{,}100 = 13{,}500\)
| Measure | What it means | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Net domestic product (NDP) | GDP minus depreciation: output left over after replacing capital that wore out | GDP overstates what the economy can add to its living standards, because some output only replaces worn-out machines and buildings |
| National income (NI) | All income earned by the owners of resources (wages, rents, interest, profits), plus taxes on production and imports | Shows how the economy’s output is divided among workers, landowners, lenders, and business owners |
| Personal income (PI) | Income households actually receive before paying personal taxes | Some income earned in production never reaches households (retained profits, corporate taxes, payroll contributions), while transfers reach them without being earned |
| Disposable income (DI) | Personal income minus personal taxes | What households can actually spend or save, so it drives consumption, the largest part of GDP |
Each measure answers a different question: how much was produced, how much was produced net of wear, how much was earned, how much did households receive, and how much can they spend?
Each step subtracts or adds something to move from total output to what households can spend.
| Step | What changes |
|---|---|
| GDP | Starting point |
| Net domestic product (NDP) | Subtract depreciation |
| National income (NI) | Equal to NDP here (the two small adjustments are zero) |
| Personal income (PI) | Subtract income earned but not received: taxes on production and imports, social insurance contributions, corporate income taxes, undistributed profits. Add transfer payments. |
| Disposable income (DI) | Subtract personal taxes |
An economy has these values (billions of dollars):
Assume the statistical discrepancy and net foreign factor income are zero.
Find NDP, national income, personal income, and disposable income.
NDP: \(13{,}500 - 1{,}100 = 12{,}400\)
NI: equal to NDP, \(12{,}400\)
PI: \(12{,}400 - (900 + 1{,}000 + 400 + 500)\) \(+ 1{,}500 = 11{,}100\)
DI: \(11{,}100 - 1{,}400 = 9{,}700\)
Disposable income is what households can spend or save.
Answer: nominal GDP rises with both output and prices, while real GDP removes the price increases.
Answer: yes, if prices rise by more than output falls.
Answer: real GDP, because it isolates changes in actual output.
Nominal GDP is GDP measured at the prices of the year in which the output is produced. It changes for two reasons:
Only the first tells us the economy is producing more. If every price doubled and output stayed the same, nominal GDP would double, but nobody would be better off.
Real GDP measures output using the prices of a fixed base year, so only quantities change from year to year.
A tiny economy produces three things. Year 1 is the base year.
| Product | Price, Year 1 | Quantity, Year 1 | Price, Year 2 | Quantity, Year 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bicycles | $200 | 10 | $240 | 11 |
| Haircuts | $20 | 100 | $25 | 104 |
| Loaves of bread | $2 | 500 | $3 | 500 |
Most of the nominal increase was higher prices, not more output.
A price index compares the cost of a fixed basket of output in the current year with its cost in the base year:
\[ \text{Price index} = \frac{\text{Nominal GDP}}{\text{Real GDP}} \times 100 \]
The base year always has an index of 100. The GDP price index (or GDP deflator) covers everything produced in the economy.
In our example, Year 2: \(6{,}740 / 5{,}280 \times 100 \approx 127.7\). Prices are about 27.7 percent higher than in the base year.
To convert nominal GDP into real GDP in base-year dollars, divide by the price index (in hundredths):
\[ \text{Real GDP} = \frac{\text{Nominal GDP}}{\text{Price index} / 100} \]
This is called deflating. If prices rose since the base year, dividing shrinks the nominal number back down to what it would be at base-year prices.
| Nominal GDP (billions) | GDP price index | |
|---|---|---|
| Year A | $4,200 | 105 |
| Year B | $4,830 | 115 |
Prices rose about 9.5 percent between the years, which explains the gap.
Answer: the base year is 2017 and the index is about 100 in that year.
Answer: the overall price level of domestic output has risen over time, which is inflation.
Answer: smaller, because deflating divides nominal GDP by a number greater than 1.
GDP is an excellent measure of output. It was never designed to measure how well people live. Its main gaps:
Consider two countries with the same GDP per person.
Which country would you rather live in? Which do you think GDP overstates or understates?
What other information would you want before comparing them?
GDP per person is an average. Recall the mean versus median discussion from Chapter 6.
GDP says nothing about who receives the output.
A side note: gross output is a broader statistic that includes sales at every stage of production, unlike GDP, which counts only final goods.
Looking ahead: Chapter 8 uses real GDP to study economic growth, and Chapter 9 uses it to study business cycles, unemployment, and inflation.